header-logo header-logo

Taxing matters

07 January 2010 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Peter Vaines examines the Pre-Budget Report, including elements that were conspicuous by their absence

The chancellor’s Pre-Budget Report did not really contain many surprises—we all knew he was going to get the bankers—we just did not know quite how. More of that in a moment.

It is quite interesting to see what he did not do:
i) He did not increase the rate of capital gains tax beyond the existing 18% level.
ii) He did not increase the corporation tax small companies rate as planned, so it remains at 21%—the main rate remains at 28%.
iii) He did not increase National Insurance Contributions (NIC) any more for the moment—although they are still planned to go up 0.5% next year, and again in 2011.
iv) He did not increase VAT beyond the 17.5% he had already proposed.
v) He will not be putting up personal allowances or the basic rate band next year.
vi) He did not alter the earlier proposal of a 50% rate on earnings over £150,000.

However, what he did do is to fiddle with inheritance tax (expected saving: too small to be measured)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll