header-logo header-logo

07 January 2010 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines examines the Pre-Budget Report, including elements that were conspicuous by their absence

The chancellor’s Pre-Budget Report did not really contain many surprises—we all knew he was going to get the bankers—we just did not know quite how. More of that in a moment.

It is quite interesting to see what he did not do:
i) He did not increase the rate of capital gains tax beyond the existing 18% level.
ii) He did not increase the corporation tax small companies rate as planned, so it remains at 21%—the main rate remains at 28%.
iii) He did not increase National Insurance Contributions (NIC) any more for the moment—although they are still planned to go up 0.5% next year, and again in 2011.
iv) He did not increase VAT beyond the 17.5% he had already proposed.
v) He will not be putting up personal allowances or the basic rate band next year.
vi) He did not alter the earlier proposal of a 50% rate on earnings over £150,000.

However, what he did do is to fiddle with inheritance tax (expected saving: too small

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
FIFA’s 2026 Men's World Cup is already mired in controversy, with complaints over ‘excessive prices’ and opaque ticketing. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys warns that governing bodies may face scrutiny under EU competition law, with allegations of a ‘dominant—if not monopolistic—position’ in ticket sales
Ten years after Brexit, UK and EU trade mark regimes are drifting apart in practice if not principle. Writing in NLJ this week, Roger Lush and Lara Elder of Carpmaels & Ransford highlight tighter UK scrutiny after SkyKick, where overly broad filings may signal ‘bad faith’
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
back-to-top-scroll