header-logo header-logo

06 January 2011 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines recounts a tale of appeals out of time

The case of R Legg TC/2010/04462 indicates that it is generally not in your interests to ignore communications from HMRC. No surprise there—but this will make your hair stand on end.

Mr Legg was contacted by HMRC who suggested that he was party to a bank account which had been credited with £3,000 interest. Mr Legg ignored it. How much tax do you think HMRC could possibly charge as a result? How about £275,000. You may laugh—and although Mr Legg thought this was a joke and “was waiting for Jeremy Beadle to appear” he should have done something because the result was a statutory demand to make him bankrupt. He made an application to the Tribunal to appeal out of time but they said: “It is not in the public interest for this matter to proceed; the amount of tax is large and an early resolution of the matter and the payment of the tax is now appropriate”.

How on earth do HMRC get

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll