header-logo header-logo

21 February 2014 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7595 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

web_vaines_0

Peter Vaines reports on a double dose of residency tests, the tax consequences of void transactions, penalties & costs

It will take time before the uncertainties in the new statutory residence test are resolved and it is only residence nerds who will keep agonising over all the various technicalities now. However, occasionally, something important pops up which deserves wider comment.

Under the automatic UK residence test, you will be conclusively UK resident if you have a UK home which is available to you for more than 91 consecutive days and you spend more than 29 days in it. So being in the UK for 30 days can be enough to make you resident. This could be an unpleasant surprise.

This will not apply if you have an overseas home where you spend more than 29 days during the year. However, a holiday home will not count. So you have a home in the UK and you have a home in France and you spend 30 days in your French home, then you are in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll