header-logo header-logo

23 October 2014 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

vaines

In his latest update on the world of tax Peter Vaines has mixed opinions on new guidance from HMRC

Over 2,600 lawyers in 44 offices located in 21 countries on five continents.

The new rules for accelerated payments and follower notices are now in force so that anybody who has participated in a disclosure of tax avoidance scheme, or in due course has an arrangement which is given the thumbs down by the GAAR Advisory Panel, is likely to have to pay the disputed tax up front.

Actually, there does not need to be any tax in dispute. Indeed, it seems clear that in many cases there will be no dispute. But you still have to pay the tax until such time as HMRC decide (if they do) that it is not disputed.

The same applies to a follower notice where HMRC is of the opinion that there is a final judicial ruling in another case which if applied to your case, would deny the tax advantage. HMRC can then ask you to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll