header-logo header-logo

Taxing matters

23 October 2014 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail
vaines

In his latest update on the world of tax Peter Vaines has mixed opinions on new guidance from HMRC

Over 2,600 lawyers in 44 offices located in 21 countries on five continents.

The new rules for accelerated payments and follower notices are now in force so that anybody who has participated in a disclosure of tax avoidance scheme, or in due course has an arrangement which is given the thumbs down by the GAAR Advisory Panel, is likely to have to pay the disputed tax up front.

Actually, there does not need to be any tax in dispute. Indeed, it seems clear that in many cases there will be no dispute. But you still have to pay the tax until such time as HMRC decide (if they do) that it is not disputed.

The same applies to a follower notice where HMRC is of the opinion that there is a final judicial ruling in another case which if applied to your case, would deny the tax advantage. HMRC can then ask you to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll