header-logo header-logo

Taxing matters

16 October 2015 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7672 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7672_vaines

Peter Vaines returns with the latest news from the world of tax

The change in the taxation of dividends announced in the Summer Budget will be a serious revenue raiser. In other words, this is a real tax increase. Strangely, it seems that the only people who will benefit are high-earning taxpayers with very modest dividends. The first £5,000 of their dividends will be exempt, whereas at the moment, they are chargeable at an effective rate of 25% or 30.6%.

It sounds like this £5,000 is good for everybody but it is no benefit at all to basic rate taxpayers. Their dividends are effectively exempt anyway because they are covered by the tax credit.

For the small business it may be pretty irritating. A husband and wife with a small business drawing salaries of £10,000 and dividends of about £30,000 each would have no income tax liability at all on their combined income of £80,000. Next year, each will have £25,000 of their dividends taxed at the new 7.5% rate.

For higher-rate taxpayers with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll