header-logo header-logo

16 October 2015 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7672 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

nlj_7672_vaines

Peter Vaines returns with the latest news from the world of tax

The change in the taxation of dividends announced in the Summer Budget will be a serious revenue raiser. In other words, this is a real tax increase. Strangely, it seems that the only people who will benefit are high-earning taxpayers with very modest dividends. The first £5,000 of their dividends will be exempt, whereas at the moment, they are chargeable at an effective rate of 25% or 30.6%.

It sounds like this £5,000 is good for everybody but it is no benefit at all to basic rate taxpayers. Their dividends are effectively exempt anyway because they are covered by the tax credit.

For the small business it may be pretty irritating. A husband and wife with a small business drawing salaries of £10,000 and dividends of about £30,000 each would have no income tax liability at all on their combined income of £80,000. Next year, each will have £25,000 of their dividends taxed at the new 7.5% rate.

For higher-rate taxpayers with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll