header-logo header-logo

22 April 2016 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7695 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

001_nlj_7695_vaines

Peter Vaines wonders what all the fuss is over the Panama Papers & reports on other recent developments in the world of tax

All this business about the Panama Papers is driving me bonkers. Everybody is getting themselves all worked up about the tax issues relating to funds deposited in Panama—but these revelations have got very little to do with tax. It seems much more likely that most of the money is not put there to escape tax (such people are hardly likely to have been paying tax anyway) but to conceal the proceeds of crime, money laundering and corruption—on a biblical scale. Indeed, in the published list of people who had money in Panama, there is a whole section entitled “Organised Crime”.

It never ceases to amaze me how in some countries, a perfectly ordinary person can be elected to high office and before very long is able to accumulate untold millions (or billions) of pounds without anybody really getting too fussed about it. It is difficult to see any legitimate way in which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll