header-logo header-logo

17 August 2012 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7527 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing taxis

Peter Vaines rounds up the latest developments in the world of tax

I suppose I ought to make some comment on the regrettably ill-informed furore over the payment of taxes.

I will make only a short point. I think the rule of law is rather important. Whatever view one takes of tax schemes there must be something rather misguided about describing people who go to (extreme) lengths to obey the law, as “morally repugnant”.

The alternative is for tax to be charged, ie for the state to take away your money, on the basis of what somebody thinks is “morally right”. No idea what this means—and of course there could be no appeal. For Mr Cameron or Mr Miliband simply to say: “I think you should pay £X (or maybe £Y (because they would never agree on the same figure) without regard to the law, might not be widely accepted as such a good idea.”

This would be a regime where the politicians are able to confiscate the property of the citizens without regard

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll