header-logo header-logo

17 August 2012 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7527 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing taxis

Peter Vaines rounds up the latest developments in the world of tax

I suppose I ought to make some comment on the regrettably ill-informed furore over the payment of taxes.

I will make only a short point. I think the rule of law is rather important. Whatever view one takes of tax schemes there must be something rather misguided about describing people who go to (extreme) lengths to obey the law, as “morally repugnant”.

The alternative is for tax to be charged, ie for the state to take away your money, on the basis of what somebody thinks is “morally right”. No idea what this means—and of course there could be no appeal. For Mr Cameron or Mr Miliband simply to say: “I think you should pay £X (or maybe £Y (because they would never agree on the same figure) without regard to the law, might not be widely accepted as such a good idea.”

This would be a regime where the politicians are able to confiscate the property of the citizens without regard

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll