header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007 / Benoit Reillier , Matthew Bennett
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

Telco headache

Does the “new” EU regulatory framework spell the end of integrated telecoms companies? ask Matthew Bennett and Benoit Reillier

The current EU telecoms regulatory framework, the so-called 2003 new regulatory framework (NRF), is now four years old. However, a “new” NRF will be proposed before the end of the year. There is currently a consultation (see www.ec.europa.eu./information_society/policy/ecomm/tomorrow/index_en.htm) to revisit the 2003 NRF, which is trying to capture the views of various stakeholders in the market to update the framework, adapt it to new markets and technological realities, and remove some of the provisions that are no longer relevant.

The current NRF contains a set of approaches and methodologies that EU member states need to follow. As part of the framework, the European Commission lists the remedies available to the national regulatory authorities (NRA) to curb the dominance of firms with significant market power. While national regulatory authorities are allowed to propose their own market definitions or remedies if they believe their national circumstances require them to deviate from the framework, this option

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll