header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007 / Benoit Reillier , Matthew Bennett
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

Telco headache

Does the “new” EU regulatory framework spell the end of integrated telecoms companies? ask Matthew Bennett and Benoit Reillier

The current EU telecoms regulatory framework, the so-called 2003 new regulatory framework (NRF), is now four years old. However, a “new” NRF will be proposed before the end of the year. There is currently a consultation (see www.ec.europa.eu./information_society/policy/ecomm/tomorrow/index_en.htm) to revisit the 2003 NRF, which is trying to capture the views of various stakeholders in the market to update the framework, adapt it to new markets and technological realities, and remove some of the provisions that are no longer relevant.

The current NRF contains a set of approaches and methodologies that EU member states need to follow. As part of the framework, the European Commission lists the remedies available to the national regulatory authorities (NRA) to curb the dominance of firms with significant market power. While national regulatory authorities are allowed to propose their own market definitions or remedies if they believe their national circumstances require them to deviate from the framework, this option

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll