header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Temporary reprieve

Practice

Temporary measures to end the stalemate over very high cost cases (VHCCs) have been announced by the Lord Chancellor Jack Straw.

The goverment hopes the initiative will encourage barristers to take on VHCCs —only 110 barristers and two QCs signed a new contract issued earlier this year, claiming that it did not offer adequate reward for the complex work involved.

The interim measures increase all rates by the same percentage and a QC or senior solicitor engaged in complex cases will now be paid £152.50 an hour—an increase of £7.50 per hour.

Although the changes were welcomed by Bar Council chairman Tim Dutton QC, he said the Bar was against the continuing use of hourly rates of pay in these cases because they “reward the least efficient and are inflammatory”.

“The interim scheme does not favour barristers over solicitors. It is a temporary adjustment, and treats both in the same way,” he added.

The Criminal Law Solicitors Association (CLSA) says that the announcement will not please everyone.

Joy Merriam, CLSA chairman, says: “There will now be fewer advocates involved in these cases and those who no longer get the work are unlikely to be grateful for a small rise in the hourly rate for their colleagues. The lesson for us all is clear—strikes work.”

Issue: 7343 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll