header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Temporary reprieve

Practice

Temporary measures to end the stalemate over very high cost cases (VHCCs) have been announced by the Lord Chancellor Jack Straw.

The goverment hopes the initiative will encourage barristers to take on VHCCs —only 110 barristers and two QCs signed a new contract issued earlier this year, claiming that it did not offer adequate reward for the complex work involved.

The interim measures increase all rates by the same percentage and a QC or senior solicitor engaged in complex cases will now be paid £152.50 an hour—an increase of £7.50 per hour.

Although the changes were welcomed by Bar Council chairman Tim Dutton QC, he said the Bar was against the continuing use of hourly rates of pay in these cases because they “reward the least efficient and are inflammatory”.

“The interim scheme does not favour barristers over solicitors. It is a temporary adjustment, and treats both in the same way,” he added.

The Criminal Law Solicitors Association (CLSA) says that the announcement will not please everyone.

Joy Merriam, CLSA chairman, says: “There will now be fewer advocates involved in these cases and those who no longer get the work are unlikely to be grateful for a small rise in the hourly rate for their colleagues. The lesson for us all is clear—strikes work.”

Issue: 7343 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll