header-logo header-logo

18 June 2009 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

In testing times

Michael Tringham reports on celebrity intestacy turmoil

Intestacies continue to produce much personal unhappiness, often accompanied by extraordinary legal activities. Mrs Taryn Butler, whose wealthy husband’s will was witnessed by one person only, finds herself having to sue her own young children so that they can all stay in the family’s £1.5m west-London home. While there is no doubt about who inherits, her problems are exacerbated by the children having to pay 40% inheritance tax—whereas as the testator’s widow Mrs Butler would have inherited tax-free. It has taken two years for the case to even approach a conclusion.

The family of the late Robert Dunlop, a Northern Ireland motor-cycle racer, faces a similar problem. Although he died in a high-speed crash more than a year ago, with no will found, the family remains unable to settle his estate.

The Law Commission is expected to refer to such instances in its general review of the law of intestacy. This will include the entitlements of different members of the deceased’s family, the role of the statutory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll