header-logo header-logo

14 January 2016
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Thames Water recieves record fine for pollution

A water utility company has been fined a record £1m for polluting a canal in Hertfordshire.

The financial penalty imposed against Thames Water Utilities is the highest yet, and is part of a broader trend towards high fines as a result of new sentencing guidelines in July 2014.

St Albans Crown Court fined Thames Water last week for discharging polluted water from a sewage treatment works into the Grand Union Canal between July 2012 and April 2013. Thames Water pleaded guilty to two offences under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010. Under the regulations, large companies with a turnover of more than £50m can expect a fine of between £7,000 and £3m.

Thames Water fully co-operated with the Environment Agency and has invested £30,000 in improved machinery to avoid a repetition of the offence.

Judge Bright QC, in his sentencing comments, reportedly warned that “the time has now come for the courts to make clear that very large organisations really must bring about the reforms and improvements for which they say they are striving”. Those who did not, he said, could expect to attract sentences “sufficiently severe to have a significant impact on their finances”.

Paul Sheridan, partner at CMS Cameron McKenna, says: “There is a discernible trend towards higher fines for environment offences. There appears to be an underlying principle that only by focusing on increasing the financial consequences of offending will due note be taken by senior directors, and notably the CEO and finance director.”

Issue: 7682 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll