header-logo header-logo

The Census Act: making it count

05 February 2020 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7873 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
15321
Neil Parpworth discusses tick-boxes, the census & the separation of powers
  • Statutory responsibility: conducting and developing a census.
  • The claim: the draft census form for 2021 does not include a Sikh ethnic tick-box.
  • Separation of powers: understanding the UK’s constitutional arrangements.

The next census for England and Wales is due to be held in 2021. Although s 1(1)(c)(i) of the Census Act 1920 provides that a census must not take place any sooner than five years after the previous census, it has been the practice since 1841 for censuses to be held every 10 years. Between censuses, much work is undertaken on the nature and content of the questions which appear on the form. This includes consulting with interested organisations and the wider general public in order to try to produce the most valuable data which in turn informs the services and funding provided by central and local government.

Statutory responsibility

Statutory responsibility for conducting a census lies with the UK Statistics Authority (UKSA), a non-ministerial department

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll