header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
05 February 2020 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7873 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

The Census Act: making it count

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
15321
Neil Parpworth discusses tick-boxes, the census & the separation of powers
  • Statutory responsibility: conducting and developing a census.
  • The claim: the draft census form for 2021 does not include a Sikh ethnic tick-box.
  • Separation of powers: understanding the UK’s constitutional arrangements.

The next census for England and Wales is due to be held in 2021. Although s 1(1)(c)(i) of the Census Act 1920 provides that a census must not take place any sooner than five years after the previous census, it has been the practice since 1841 for censuses to be held every 10 years. Between censuses, much work is undertaken on the nature and content of the questions which appear on the form. This includes consulting with interested organisations and the wider general public in order to try to produce the most valuable data which in turn informs the services and funding provided by central and local government.

Statutory responsibility

Statutory responsibility for conducting a census lies with the UK Statistics Authority (UKSA), a non-ministerial department

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Read All
APIL sees off ‘substantial prejudice’ defence
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
NLJ this week: Civil practice with claws & caution
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
NLJ this week: Stealing virtual gold?
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll