header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
05 February 2020 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7873 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

The Census Act: making it count

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
15321
Neil Parpworth discusses tick-boxes, the census & the separation of powers
  • Statutory responsibility: conducting and developing a census.
  • The claim: the draft census form for 2021 does not include a Sikh ethnic tick-box.
  • Separation of powers: understanding the UK’s constitutional arrangements.

The next census for England and Wales is due to be held in 2021. Although s 1(1)(c)(i) of the Census Act 1920 provides that a census must not take place any sooner than five years after the previous census, it has been the practice since 1841 for censuses to be held every 10 years. Between censuses, much work is undertaken on the nature and content of the questions which appear on the form. This includes consulting with interested organisations and the wider general public in order to try to produce the most valuable data which in turn informs the services and funding provided by central and local government.

Statutory responsibility

Statutory responsibility for conducting a census lies with the UK Statistics Authority (UKSA), a non-ministerial department

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll