header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

The dark side of sperm donation

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
25 July 2025 / Aysel Akhundova
Issue: 8126 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law , Health , Health & safety , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
226379
Unregulated practice risks turning the dream of parenthood into a legal nightmare: Aysel Akhundova sets out the far-reaching & costly consequences
  • Unregulated sperm donation bypasses the protections of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, exposing families to legal disputes over parenthood, lack of medical screening, and potential health risks.
  • Children born through unregulated arrangements may lack access to vital genetic information, while parents face ongoing anxiety due to legal uncertainties and absence of enforceable agreements.
  • This article advocates for stronger regulation, public awareness, and improved access to licensed fertility services to mitigate the growing risks of the unregulated sperm donation market.

Beneath the surface of increased accessibility to parenthood lurks a hidden danger—the rise of unregulated sperm donation. A quick internet search reveals numerous platforms where individuals can find sperm donors online, with some offering their ‘services’ for free, including both artificial insemination and natural conception arrangements. Family lawyers would gasp at this development, as we are well aware of the profound legal implications.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

Charity strengthens leadership as national Pro Bono Week takes place

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Dual-qualified partner joins London disputes practice

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

Transactions practice welcomes partner in London office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Form N510—not just a box to tick
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
NLJ this week: Delegation or dereliction?
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
NLJ this week: FCA faces its toughest test yet
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
NLJ this week: Instructing the right expert
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Striking back at SLAPPs
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023, in NLJ this week
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll