header-logo header-logo

25 July 2025 / Aysel Akhundova
Issue: 8126 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law , Health , Health & safety , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

The dark side of sperm donation

226379
Unregulated practice risks turning the dream of parenthood into a legal nightmare: Aysel Akhundova sets out the far-reaching & costly consequences
  • Unregulated sperm donation bypasses the protections of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, exposing families to legal disputes over parenthood, lack of medical screening, and potential health risks.
  • Children born through unregulated arrangements may lack access to vital genetic information, while parents face ongoing anxiety due to legal uncertainties and absence of enforceable agreements.
  • This article advocates for stronger regulation, public awareness, and improved access to licensed fertility services to mitigate the growing risks of the unregulated sperm donation market.

Beneath the surface of increased accessibility to parenthood lurks a hidden danger—the rise of unregulated sperm donation. A quick internet search reveals numerous platforms where individuals can find sperm donors online, with some offering their ‘services’ for free, including both artificial insemination and natural conception arrangements. Family lawyers would gasp at this development, as we are well aware of the profound legal implications.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll