header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
25 July 2025 / Aysel Akhundova
Issue: 8126 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law , Health , Health & safety , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

The dark side of sperm donation

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
226379
Unregulated practice risks turning the dream of parenthood into a legal nightmare: Aysel Akhundova sets out the far-reaching & costly consequences
  • Unregulated sperm donation bypasses the protections of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, exposing families to legal disputes over parenthood, lack of medical screening, and potential health risks.
  • Children born through unregulated arrangements may lack access to vital genetic information, while parents face ongoing anxiety due to legal uncertainties and absence of enforceable agreements.
  • This article advocates for stronger regulation, public awareness, and improved access to licensed fertility services to mitigate the growing risks of the unregulated sperm donation market.

Beneath the surface of increased accessibility to parenthood lurks a hidden danger—the rise of unregulated sperm donation. A quick internet search reveals numerous platforms where individuals can find sperm donors online, with some offering their ‘services’ for free, including both artificial insemination and natural conception arrangements. Family lawyers would gasp at this development, as we are well aware of the profound legal implications.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll