header-logo header-logo

20 February 2020 / Georgina Squire
Issue: 7875 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

The Disclosure Pilot Scheme: a smooth take off?

16313
Georgina Squire charts the progress of the use & application of the new disclosure regime
  • Over a year into the pilot, we explore some of the judgments which have provided some useful direction on its application.

The Disclosure Pilot Scheme was introduced into the Business and Property Courts in January 2019 to explore the viability of a simpler and more cost-effective disclosure regime. Implemented through CPR Practice Direction 51U, the pilot uses a two-part system of Initial Disclosure and Extended Disclosure to limit the search terms and the volume of documents requiring review and disclosure. Initial Disclosure requires that parties only disclose the key documents on which they rely and those which are necessary to understand the claim. In order for a party to obtain additional documents, it must request Extended Disclosure from the court using one the five predetermined Disclosure Models.

The pilot received almost immediate clarification on its applicability to existing cases in White Winston Select Asset Funds LLC v Mahon [2019]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll