header-logo header-logo

20 February 2020 / Georgina Squire
Issue: 7875 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

The Disclosure Pilot Scheme: a smooth take off?

16313
Georgina Squire charts the progress of the use & application of the new disclosure regime
  • Over a year into the pilot, we explore some of the judgments which have provided some useful direction on its application.

The Disclosure Pilot Scheme was introduced into the Business and Property Courts in January 2019 to explore the viability of a simpler and more cost-effective disclosure regime. Implemented through CPR Practice Direction 51U, the pilot uses a two-part system of Initial Disclosure and Extended Disclosure to limit the search terms and the volume of documents requiring review and disclosure. Initial Disclosure requires that parties only disclose the key documents on which they rely and those which are necessary to understand the claim. In order for a party to obtain additional documents, it must request Extended Disclosure from the court using one the five predetermined Disclosure Models.

The pilot received almost immediate clarification on its applicability to existing cases in White Winston Select Asset Funds LLC v Mahon [2019]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll