header-logo header-logo

The ECHR: out of order or out of fashion

15 March 2024 / Malcolm Bishop KC
Issue: 8063 / Categories: Features , EU , Constitutional law , Public
printer mail-detail
163725
Malcolm Bishop KC looks back on the UK’s role in shaping our European Convention rights

‘We need to get rid of this European Convention! We can’t have foreign judges in foreign courts telling us what to do—we need to take back control.’ These and similar sentiments could be heard not only in the hostelries up and down the country but even occasionally in the Inns of Court. But we should be careful what we wish for, because the consequences may be the opposite of that intended.

Drafting the Convention

It might be helpful therefore to look at what some seek to get rid of, and how it all started. On 4 November 1950, some 15 European states met at Rome to sign the European Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. The UK was a prominent member of that meeting and indeed the text of the convention itself was largely the work of a team of Oxbridge professors headed by Sir

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

360 Law Group—Anthony Gahan

360 Law Group—Anthony Gahan

Investment banking veteran appointed as chairman to drive global growth

NEWS
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
back-to-top-scroll