header-logo header-logo

21 June 2023
Issue: 8030 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Company
printer mail-detail

The identification doctrine under scrutiny

The Home Office has announced plans to modernise the identification doctrine, which holds companies criminally liable for offences.

An addition to the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, announced last week, will bring senior managers within scope of who can be considered the ‘directing mind and will’ of a business.

Currently, the identification doctrine is interpreted as applying to members of the board, such as chief executives. Complex management structures mean prosecutors struggle to prove key decision-makers are part of the company’s ‘directing mind’.

Andrew Penhale, chief crown prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service, said the reform ‘will further enhance the tools available to prosecutors’.

Alun Milford, partner at Kingsley Napley, said the proposal was ‘potentially very significant in fraud cases.

‘However, the devil is in the detail and whether the dramatic promises made by the government will result in any successful corporate prosecutions for economic crime will depend to a very large extent on how exactly a “senior manager” is defined in the new law.’ 

Issue: 8030 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Company
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll