header-logo header-logo

The Law Society—Richard Atkinson

15 August 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Criminal legal aid solicitor elected as deputy vice president

Richard Atkinson has won the Law Society of England and Wales 2022 election for deputy vice president of the solicitor profession, it was announced today.

Richard Atkinson takes office in October 2022—becoming vice president in 2023 and president in 2024 to 2025, when the Law Society will mark its 200th anniversary.

Richard has specialised in criminal law for 30 years with a focus on serious crime litigation. He is a duty solicitor and a higher rights advocate, representing clients in court.

Richard has been a Law Society council member since December 2016 as the constituency member for Kent. He sits on the Law Society’s criminal law committee, having chaired this committee for six years, and is a member of the Law Society’s policy and regulatory affairs committee.

He was shortlisted for Legal Personality of the Year at the Law Society Awards in 2021 and received a special award from the Legal Aid Practitioner Group for his work protecting solicitors who were providing legal advice to suspects detained in police stations during the pandemic.

Richard is a member of the Home Office’s Police and Criminal Evidence advisory board, the National disclosure forum and the Crown Court Improvement group. He was on the advisory panel for the recent Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid Chaired by Sir Christopher Bellamy QC.

Commenting on his win, Richard said: 'I am honoured to be elected as deputy vice president of the Law Society. I stood for office because of my strong belief in our profession, its values and the work it does to support our clients and uphold the rule of law.

'As lawyers we need to be courageous and speak out on behalf of those less able, for the independence of the legal system and institutions that are key to a functioning democracy. Many of these are under threat, not least our criminal justice system.'

I. Stephanie Boyce, president of the Law Society, said: 'My congratulations go to Richard Atkinson who emerged as the winner from a strong field of candidates. I wish him all the very best for his three years as a Law Society office holder.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Private wealth and tax offering bolstered by partner hire

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
back-to-top-scroll