header-logo header-logo

28 March 2025 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Opinion , Rule of law
printer mail-detail

The lecture that never was?

212908
What is the point of a state adhering to the rule of law if it doesn’t talk about it? Roger Smith ponders a mysterious cancellation

Let’s begin with what might—or might not—be a mystery. Lord Hermer, the Attorney General (AG), was advertised as giving the Miriam Rothschild Memorial Lecture on the subject ‘What has the rule of law ever done for us?’ in mid-March. Good title. Surely nothing out of order there. But this broad topic was rapidly cut back to the much more limited ‘The rule of law and the government’s missions’ (there were five: could you name them?), and then, just as abruptly, was cancelled. Regrettably, it was said that the AG was ‘likely to be abroad’.

So, what is to be seen here? The usual exigencies of government, or something more interesting?

Personal commitment

Lord Hermer’s personal commitment to the rule of law cannot be questioned. He is a veteran of Geoffrey Robertson’s Doughty Street Chambers and a former head of Matrix—from which he was plucked by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll