header-logo header-logo

The lecture that never was?

28 March 2025 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Opinion , Rule of law
printer mail-detail
212908
What is the point of a state adhering to the rule of law if it doesn’t talk about it? Roger Smith ponders a mysterious cancellation

Let’s begin with what might—or might not—be a mystery. Lord Hermer, the Attorney General (AG), was advertised as giving the Miriam Rothschild Memorial Lecture on the subject ‘What has the rule of law ever done for us?’ in mid-March. Good title. Surely nothing out of order there. But this broad topic was rapidly cut back to the much more limited ‘The rule of law and the government’s missions’ (there were five: could you name them?), and then, just as abruptly, was cancelled. Regrettably, it was said that the AG was ‘likely to be abroad’.

So, what is to be seen here? The usual exigencies of government, or something more interesting?

Personal commitment

Lord Hermer’s personal commitment to the rule of law cannot be questioned. He is a veteran of Geoffrey Robertson’s Doughty Street Chambers and a former head of Matrix—from which he was plucked by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll