header-logo header-logo

The mental health paradigm

15 December 2023 / Laura Davidson
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail
151428
Laura Davidson asks if new UN guidance could topple compulsory detention & enforced medical treatment
  • Covers guidance issued by the World Health Organisation and the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
  • Suggests it may help end practices of coercion and compulsory treatment, and could have a stronger impact than international human rights law.

A quarter of a century ago, the UK ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). It prohibits discrimination, including against those with ‘mental… [or] intellectual impairments’ (Art 1). Despite being binding, global compliance remains patchy. However, all psychiatric coercion—compulsory hospitalisation, physical and chemical restraint, seclusion and segregation—is discriminatory and hence unlawful.

The European Court of Human Rights deems psychiatric force lawful if necessary and proportionate, the least restrictive option and a last resort. The UK’s 40-year-old Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) permits coercion to protect someone’s health or safety, or others (s 2(2) and s 3(2)). Restraint (which may cause death) and seclusion (a recognised form of torture) can

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll