header-logo header-logo

The new Product Liability Directive: fireworks or fizzle?

04 November 2022 / Sarah Moore , Stuart Warmington
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Features , Profession , Commercial
printer mail-detail
99722
Don’t get your hopes up? Sarah Moore & Stuart Warmington consider the European Commission’s proposals for a claimant-friendly overhaul of the PLD
  • The European Commission’s proposed updates to the Product Liability Directive include a focus on bringing liability rules up to date for the digital era, and easing the burden of proof in complex cases.
  • However, it is unclear what impact the proposed reforms will have in practice— particularly in the UK post-Brexit.

At the end of September, the European Commission published its proposal for an updated Product Liability Directive (PLD). In principle, the commission’s proposals promise a claimant-friendly overhaul of the existing PLD. In practice however, particularly for product liability litigators practising in the UK, there are good reasons to suspect that the proposed amendments may result in more of a fizzle than a firework.

The proposals

The original PLD was first adopted by member states almost 40 years ago, in 1985. Since that date much has changed, and will continue to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll