header-logo header-logo

The new Product Liability Directive: fireworks or fizzle?

04 November 2022 / Sarah Moore , Stuart Warmington
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Features , Profession , Commercial
printer mail-detail
99722
Don’t get your hopes up? Sarah Moore & Stuart Warmington consider the European Commission’s proposals for a claimant-friendly overhaul of the PLD
  • The European Commission’s proposed updates to the Product Liability Directive include a focus on bringing liability rules up to date for the digital era, and easing the burden of proof in complex cases.
  • However, it is unclear what impact the proposed reforms will have in practice— particularly in the UK post-Brexit.

At the end of September, the European Commission published its proposal for an updated Product Liability Directive (PLD). In principle, the commission’s proposals promise a claimant-friendly overhaul of the existing PLD. In practice however, particularly for product liability litigators practising in the UK, there are good reasons to suspect that the proposed amendments may result in more of a fizzle than a firework.

The proposals

The original PLD was first adopted by member states almost 40 years ago, in 1985. Since that date much has changed, and will continue to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

Kadie Bennett, senior associate at Anthony Collins and chair of the Resolution West Midlands Group, discusses her long-standing passion for family law and calls for unity in the profession

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Firm appoints new UK senior partner for 2026

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Healthcare and sports legal team expands in the north west

NEWS
Lawyers and users of the business and property courts are invited to share their views on disclosure, in particular the operation of PD 57AD and the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI)
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
back-to-top-scroll