header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 June 2015 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7655 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

There may be trouble ahead

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7655_morris

Geraldine Morris looks at the newly elected government’s plans & the potential impact on family law

So, the new government is the old one, but without their former coalition partners the Liberal Democrats. There were many policy aspects of the previous government that caused family lawyers concern, although of course there were some positive aspects too for others. The Conservative party’s second term provides them with an opportunity to follow through on policy developments started in their first term, as well as develop areas of reform they had alluded to previously such as human rights. The following is a summary of some areas of potential change.

Human rights

This is the big one. The government has said that it will seek to repeal the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and replace it with a UK Bill of Rights. Tory heavyweight, Michael Gove, has been appointed as Lord Chancellor reportedly as a man on a mission to see this through. Human rights are the lifeblood of family law; a few examples are:

  • A
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll