header-logo header-logo

06 May 2016 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7697 / Categories: Features , Public , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Theresa May up a gum tree

nlj_7697_zander

Michael Zander QC on the Home Secretary’s attempt to justify withdrawal from the ECHR while remaining in the EU

Theresa May certainly got a reaction when she urged last week (25 April) that while remaining in the EU, the UK should withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). In her first speech of the EU referendum campaign, Mrs May said we should leave the ECHR because “it can bind the hands of Parliament” and “makes us less secure by preventing the deportation of dangerous foreign nationals”.

She was swiftly and categorically slapped down by Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Justice, the minister in charge of the topic, who told MPs that he agreed with former Attorney General Dominic Grieve. “Both of us believe that we should remain within the European Convention on Human Rights”. His junior minister, Mr Dominic Raab, and the present Attorney General, Mr Jeremy Wright QC, responding to an urgent question in the Commons on 26 April both confirmed that the government’s policy was to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll