header-logo header-logo

04 November 2016 / Bryan Greetham
Issue: 7721 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Thinking smart

Lawyers need to go beyond the bounds of orthodox thinking, says Bryan Greetham

During the inter-war period a German chemist was searching for what we would now describe as an antibiotic. Every evening before he left his laboratory he would set out bacteria in petri dishes so they could grow during the night ready for him to work on them the next day. But day after day he noticed that many of the bacteria were dead with mould spores on them. He concluded that the spores came from the mould growing in the corners of the laboratory. Therefore he had it thoroughly cleaned and decontaminated, so he could carry on his work.

Unfortunately he was unable to find a chemical substance that was successful in killing the bacteria. Yet, if he had been able to free himself from the orthodox explanations and expectations of his profession, he might have realised that the mould spores that killed the bacteria could have been a source of the very antibiotic he was looking for. He might then have won the Nobel

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll