header-logo header-logo

24 January 2020
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

This week's NLJ: ...and now live from the Old Bailey

Lawyers gave a mixed reaction to news that cameras will be allowed in the Crown Court as early as April or May this year

A ten-second delay will operate and filming will be limited to the judge’s sentencing. Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, said: ‘I have pressed for this change since I took office two years ago.’

Several lawyers urged caution, fearing context could be missed and facts distorted. Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said the initiative would ‘help people understand the realities of our criminal justice system’ but warned: ‘Sentencing must not become an armchair, spectator sport.’                                            

Writing in NLJ this week, however, John Cooper QC argues: ‘Any adult may walk into any Crown Court across the country and listen to proceedings.

‘The widest possible dissemination of the sentencing process can only add to transparency, understanding and, hopefully trust in the criminal justice system.’

Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll