header-logo header-logo

Threat to client confidentiality

19 September 2018
Issue: 7809 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The historic legal right to lawyer-client confidentiality could be put in jeopardy if proposed anti-terror laws go ahead, solicitors have warned.

The Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill, has already passed through the House of Commons and is due to have its second reading in the House of Lords in October. It gives border guards powers to stop and detain travellers for questioning without suspicion they have committed an offence.

However, the Law Society has pointed out several shortcomings—there is no right to consult a solicitor if a person is examined and questioned for under an hour; and access to a solicitor is only given on request. Moreover, the Society says, the bill ‘compromises the right to a solicitor of a detained person by requiring an officer to be present during the consultation with the solicitor’. And in certain circumstances, access to a solicitor can be further delayed where this is authorised by a police officer of at least the rank of superintendent.

‘Everyone under suspicion of a crime should be able to access confidential legal advice, particularly when facing serious charges,’ said Law Society president Christina Blacklaws.

‘Even when a solicitor is present, the bill currently only allows the suspect to consult them when an officer is listening in. The confidential nature of communication between a lawyer and their client has long been affirmed as a fundamental human right.’

A Home Office spokesperson said: ‘The UK faces a sustained threat from hostile state activity and it is essential that police officers have the power to question individuals at UK ports and the border area to determine whether they pose a threat to our national security.’

Issue: 7809 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Manchester firm strengthens Court of Protection expertise with partner hire

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Agricultural law team expands with senior director appointments

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll