header-logo header-logo

25 April 2014
Issue: 7604 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

“Threat of costs recovery” encourages settlement

Ministry of Justice plans to apply the Jackson reforms to insolvency litigation could cost creditors as much as £150m, insolvency practitioners’ group R3 has warned.

Currently, insolvency litigation is exempt from the Jackson reforms. However, this exemption is due to be scrapped in April 2015.

R3 says this will adversely affect creditors since, once Jackson applies, insolvency practitioners will no longer be able to fully recover costs from directors of insolvent businesses and therefore legal action to reclaim money from unscrupulous directors will be unaffordable.

An independent report commissioned by R3, and conducted by Professor Peter Walton of the University of Wolverhampton, found that nearly 89% of the 83% of insolvency cases that settle before court would not do so without the exemption in place.

Phillip Sykes, deputy vice-president of R3, says: “The threat of having costs recovered from them encourages directors to settle before cases reach court. 

“This means lower legal costs, lower insolvency practitioner fees, and higher returns for creditors. Without the threat of recoverable costs, directors know most creditors won’t be able to afford a lengthy court fight to retrieve funds. They will be much less concerned about the ramifications of taking money that isn’t theirs from a business.

“Insolvency litigation returns money to creditors, and helps ensure businesses and banks remain confident about lending. It protects taxpayer funds, it stops directors making off with money that isn’t theirs, and it deters directors from even thinking about doing so in the first place. Should the exemption be removed, only a few large cases involving wealthy, motivated creditors would go ahead. SMEs and taxpayers would lose out—and irresponsible directors would be laughing.”

 

Issue: 7604 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll