header-logo header-logo

“Threat of costs recovery” encourages settlement

25 April 2014
Issue: 7604 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Ministry of Justice plans to apply the Jackson reforms to insolvency litigation could cost creditors as much as £150m, insolvency practitioners’ group R3 has warned.

Currently, insolvency litigation is exempt from the Jackson reforms. However, this exemption is due to be scrapped in April 2015.

R3 says this will adversely affect creditors since, once Jackson applies, insolvency practitioners will no longer be able to fully recover costs from directors of insolvent businesses and therefore legal action to reclaim money from unscrupulous directors will be unaffordable.

An independent report commissioned by R3, and conducted by Professor Peter Walton of the University of Wolverhampton, found that nearly 89% of the 83% of insolvency cases that settle before court would not do so without the exemption in place.

Phillip Sykes, deputy vice-president of R3, says: “The threat of having costs recovered from them encourages directors to settle before cases reach court. 

“This means lower legal costs, lower insolvency practitioner fees, and higher returns for creditors. Without the threat of recoverable costs, directors know most creditors won’t be able to afford a lengthy court fight to retrieve funds. They will be much less concerned about the ramifications of taking money that isn’t theirs from a business.

“Insolvency litigation returns money to creditors, and helps ensure businesses and banks remain confident about lending. It protects taxpayer funds, it stops directors making off with money that isn’t theirs, and it deters directors from even thinking about doing so in the first place. Should the exemption be removed, only a few large cases involving wealthy, motivated creditors would go ahead. SMEs and taxpayers would lose out—and irresponsible directors would be laughing.”

 

Issue: 7604 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll