header-logo header-logo

Time up for the ban?

21 June 2007 / Colin Munro
Issue: 7278 / Categories: Features , Media
printer mail-detail

Colin Munro explains why the ban on political advertising in broadcasting faces challenges

It is by no means obvious that charities campaigning to make poverty history should be banned from advertising on British television, when casinos and betting firms are being given greater freedom to advertise. Nor is it evident that an oil major or an airline should be able to advertise and boast of its green credentials, while an environmental group cannot advertise to rebut the claims. Yet these are the effects of the laws and code rules governing what may or may not be advertised on television or radio.

In particular, the wholesale ban on paid political advertising is an extensive restriction. In the UK, paid political advertising has never been permitted in the broadcast media. The current rule is found in the Communications Act 2003 (CA 2003), s 319, prohibiting political advertising, which is defined in s 321(2) as comprising:

“(a) an advertisement which is inserted by or on behalf of a body whose objects are wholly or mainly of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll