header-logo header-logo

21 June 2007 / Colin Munro
Issue: 7278 / Categories: Features , Media
printer mail-detail

Time up for the ban?

Colin Munro explains why the ban on political advertising in broadcasting faces challenges

It is by no means obvious that charities campaigning to make poverty history should be banned from advertising on British television, when casinos and betting firms are being given greater freedom to advertise. Nor is it evident that an oil major or an airline should be able to advertise and boast of its green credentials, while an environmental group cannot advertise to rebut the claims. Yet these are the effects of the laws and code rules governing what may or may not be advertised on television or radio.

In particular, the wholesale ban on paid political advertising is an extensive restriction. In the UK, paid political advertising has never been permitted in the broadcast media. The current rule is found in the Communications Act 2003 (CA 2003), s 319, prohibiting political advertising, which is defined in s 321(2) as comprising:

“(a) an advertisement which is inserted by or on behalf of a body whose objects are wholly or mainly of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll