header-logo header-logo

21 June 2007 / Colin Munro
Issue: 7278 / Categories: Features , Media
printer mail-detail

Time up for the ban?

Colin Munro explains why the ban on political advertising in broadcasting faces challenges

It is by no means obvious that charities campaigning to make poverty history should be banned from advertising on British television, when casinos and betting firms are being given greater freedom to advertise. Nor is it evident that an oil major or an airline should be able to advertise and boast of its green credentials, while an environmental group cannot advertise to rebut the claims. Yet these are the effects of the laws and code rules governing what may or may not be advertised on television or radio.

In particular, the wholesale ban on paid political advertising is an extensive restriction. In the UK, paid political advertising has never been permitted in the broadcast media. The current rule is found in the Communications Act 2003 (CA 2003), s 319, prohibiting political advertising, which is defined in s 321(2) as comprising:

“(a) an advertisement which is inserted by or on behalf of a body whose objects are wholly or mainly of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll