header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007 / Rachel Anne Fenton
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Time for change (1)

In the first of two articles, Rachel Fenton and Fiona Dabell explain why the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act needs urgent review

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (HFEA 1990), which regulates assisted reproduction and embryo research, is under review. The issues decided by the government of 1990 were, and remain, controversial and it is unsurprising that there has been continued debate about their regulation. Contentious issues, such as posthumous pregnancy, so-called “saviour siblings”, cloning, and the withdrawal of consent to the use of embryos upon relationship breakdown have received much media attention and high profile legal challenges to HFEA 1990 have been mounted by interest groups. These have all contributed to the need to review the current legislation.

Following the birth of Louise Brown in 1978, a committee of inquiry led by philosopher Dame Mary Warnock was set up in 1982 to examine the ethical and legal implications of the new reproductive technologies that were becoming available. The committee reported in 1984 and HFEA 1990 was predicated upon its inherently libertarian

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll