header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007 / Rachel Anne Fenton
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Time for change (1)

In the first of two articles, Rachel Fenton and Fiona Dabell explain why the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act needs urgent review

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (HFEA 1990), which regulates assisted reproduction and embryo research, is under review. The issues decided by the government of 1990 were, and remain, controversial and it is unsurprising that there has been continued debate about their regulation. Contentious issues, such as posthumous pregnancy, so-called “saviour siblings”, cloning, and the withdrawal of consent to the use of embryos upon relationship breakdown have received much media attention and high profile legal challenges to HFEA 1990 have been mounted by interest groups. These have all contributed to the need to review the current legislation.

Following the birth of Louise Brown in 1978, a committee of inquiry led by philosopher Dame Mary Warnock was set up in 1982 to examine the ethical and legal implications of the new reproductive technologies that were becoming available. The committee reported in 1984 and HFEA 1990 was predicated upon its inherently libertarian

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll