header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Time for change?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
21 March 2025 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 8109 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
211940
The Law Commission has set out the case for radical reform of the criminal appeals process: is it enough? Jon Robins reports

‘Do you think judges are any less gullible than they used to be?’ The question was posed by the former MP Chris Mullin at an event to mark the 50th anniversary of the Birmingham Six in the House of Commons earlier this month. ‘The Court of Appeal used to consist of some of the most closed minds in the land,’ he added. As a journalist, he did much to expose the terrible injustice that, along with other Irish cases such as the Guildford Four and Maguire Seven, shook the public’s faith in our justice system and led to fundamental reform of the justice system, including the creation of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).

Appeals under review

I have argued before that if the CCRC does one job well, it is deflecting attention away from the problems elsewhere, including the Court of Appeal (see ‘Justice under review (Pt 2)’,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Alarm bells over Mazur
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Jury trial & a constitutional illusion
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
NLJ this week: The rise—and risks—of going private
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
NLJ this week: Human rights disputes push courts to redefine their role
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Debarment orders—shortcut or minefield?
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll