header-logo header-logo

10 October 2013 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Time for a litigation supplement?

130896003

Sarah Moore exposes some regulatory deficiencies in the world of vitamins & supplements

In the UK, the “nutritional supplement” and vitamin industry is big business—currently worth around £400m a year. One factor facilitating this growth is a regulatory environment that allows companies to promote their products in flagrant breach of labelling and advertising rules, with little risk of significant penalty or large scale consumer litigation.

As a result, the UK consumer is left exposed to the misleading claims of some manufacturers who promote their “health” products with labelling fictions that have little to do with the product inside the packaging. On the whole, the risk for consumers of vitamins and supplements is not one of personal injury per se, but rather that they purchase expensive products on the basis of fraudulent labelling claims. Within this context it is vital that manufacturers are compelled to either substantiate their products’ claims to medical efficacy, or remove them: under the current regulatory system in the UK this is not happening.

At the end of August,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll