header-logo header-logo

10 October 2013 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Time for a litigation supplement?

130896003

Sarah Moore exposes some regulatory deficiencies in the world of vitamins & supplements

In the UK, the “nutritional supplement” and vitamin industry is big business—currently worth around £400m a year. One factor facilitating this growth is a regulatory environment that allows companies to promote their products in flagrant breach of labelling and advertising rules, with little risk of significant penalty or large scale consumer litigation.

As a result, the UK consumer is left exposed to the misleading claims of some manufacturers who promote their “health” products with labelling fictions that have little to do with the product inside the packaging. On the whole, the risk for consumers of vitamins and supplements is not one of personal injury per se, but rather that they purchase expensive products on the basis of fraudulent labelling claims. Within this context it is vital that manufacturers are compelled to either substantiate their products’ claims to medical efficacy, or remove them: under the current regulatory system in the UK this is not happening.

At the end of August,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll