header-logo header-logo

16 March 2012 / David Greene
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time for a new model?

Has the partnership model had its day? David Greene reports

Way back in 2007, the main change perpetrated by the Legal Services Act seemed to be a shake-up in regulation of solicitors overseen by the Legal Services Board (LSB). One would hardly have considered at the time that other provisions of the Legal Services Act were going to set the world alight. The latest piece in the Legal Services Act jigsaw, however, the creation of alternative business structures (ABSs), may yet convert the Act into the legal service’s “big bang.”

A brief history

The Legal Services Act 2007 brought changes in three areas of practice.
 

  • First, it created the LSB to oversee the regulation of legal services by approved regulators such as the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and the Bar Standards Board. When the Council for Licensed Conveyancers also secured a licence from the LSB, it was thought that perhaps competition between regulators might open up the market. That may well happen in the future, but the changes thus far
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll