header-logo header-logo

16 March 2012 / David Greene
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time for a new model?

Has the partnership model had its day? David Greene reports

Way back in 2007, the main change perpetrated by the Legal Services Act seemed to be a shake-up in regulation of solicitors overseen by the Legal Services Board (LSB). One would hardly have considered at the time that other provisions of the Legal Services Act were going to set the world alight. The latest piece in the Legal Services Act jigsaw, however, the creation of alternative business structures (ABSs), may yet convert the Act into the legal service’s “big bang.”

A brief history

The Legal Services Act 2007 brought changes in three areas of practice.
 

  • First, it created the LSB to oversee the regulation of legal services by approved regulators such as the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and the Bar Standards Board. When the Council for Licensed Conveyancers also secured a licence from the LSB, it was thought that perhaps competition between regulators might open up the market. That may well happen in the future, but the changes thus far
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll