header-logo header-logo

24 April 2024
Issue: 8068 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

Timeline announced for PACCAR review

The Civil Justice Council has set a deadline of summer 2024 for its interim report into post-PACCAR reforms, with the full report due by summer 2025

Under the terms of reference, published this week, the review will set out the current position of third-party funding, consider whether third-party funding should be regulated and whether current arrangements deliver effective access to justice, and make clear recommendations for reform.

Last year, the Supreme Court held some litigation funding agreements are unenforceable, in R (PACCAR) v Competition Appeal Tribunal [2023] UKSC 28.

The Litigation Funding Agreements (Enforceability) Bill, currently before Parliament, will make it easier for litigants to secure third-party funding for claims against large corporations.

Martyn Day, co-president of Collective Redress Lawyers Association, said: ‘We will encourage the review to carefully consider the pitfalls of “over regulating” the sector and the inherent dangers of artificially limiting the remuneration available to funders.’

Issue: 8068 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll