header-logo header-logo

Timeline announced for PACCAR review

24 April 2024
Issue: 8068 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

The Civil Justice Council has set a deadline of summer 2024 for its interim report into post-PACCAR reforms, with the full report due by summer 2025

Under the terms of reference, published this week, the review will set out the current position of third-party funding, consider whether third-party funding should be regulated and whether current arrangements deliver effective access to justice, and make clear recommendations for reform.

Last year, the Supreme Court held some litigation funding agreements are unenforceable, in R (PACCAR) v Competition Appeal Tribunal [2023] UKSC 28.

The Litigation Funding Agreements (Enforceability) Bill, currently before Parliament, will make it easier for litigants to secure third-party funding for claims against large corporations.

Martyn Day, co-president of Collective Redress Lawyers Association, said: ‘We will encourage the review to carefully consider the pitfalls of “over regulating” the sector and the inherent dangers of artificially limiting the remuneration available to funders.’

Issue: 8068 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll