header-logo header-logo

30 July 2009 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Tools of change

Geraldine Morris explains the fundamental principles of mediation

By virtue of the Law Society’s Family Law Protocol (since February 2002) , unless it is clearly inappropriate to do so, family solicitors are required to explain mediation and collaborative processes and advise on thae benefits and/or limitations in the client’s specific case plus the role of the solicitor in supporting the mediation process where appropriate. Thus methods of ADR cannot be disregarded by family lawyers who are not trained mediators or collaborative lawyers. The suitability of ADR cannot then be forgotten after the initial advice, but rather kept under review throughout.  A distinction may be drawn between the role of a mediator (who may or may not be a family lawyer) and the mediation based skills many family lawyers have developed in the course of their normal practice.

The client

It is inevitable that parties experiencing the breakdown of their own relationship will find it difficult to separate out their roles as parents (which will continue) and partners/spouses/civil partners. Both family lawyers and mediators

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll