header-logo header-logo

30 May 2008
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Tort

R v Porter [2008] All ER (D) 249 (May)

In a prosecution under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, the risk that the prosecution has to prove must be real, not fanciful or hypothetical. There is no objective standard or test by which a line can be drawn which will be applicable to every case.

However, most cases will have important factors which the jury will be obliged to take into account in deciding whether or not the risk was real or fanciful. None was determinative, but many were of importance. While the fact that an accident was unavoidable goes primarily to the reasonable practicability of measures which the defendant might have to take, rather than to the risk to safety, it does not do so exclusively.

Risk that is part of everyday incidents of life goes to the issue of whether or not an injured person was exposed to risk by the conduct of the defendant’s operation. Where the risk is truly part of the incident of everyday life, it is less likely that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

Pillsbury—Matthew Sperry

Pillsbury—Matthew Sperry

Pillsbury expands private client and family office platform with Cadwalader partner hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll