header-logo header-logo

Tort

30 May 2008
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Porter [2008] All ER (D) 249 (May)

In a prosecution under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, the risk that the prosecution has to prove must be real, not fanciful or hypothetical. There is no objective standard or test by which a line can be drawn which will be applicable to every case.

However, most cases will have important factors which the jury will be obliged to take into account in deciding whether or not the risk was real or fanciful. None was determinative, but many were of importance. While the fact that an accident was unavoidable goes primarily to the reasonable practicability of measures which the defendant might have to take, rather than to the risk to safety, it does not do so exclusively.

Risk that is part of everyday incidents of life goes to the issue of whether or not an injured person was exposed to risk by the conduct of the defendant’s operation. Where the risk is truly part of the incident of everyday life, it is less likely that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll