header-logo header-logo

30 May 2008
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Tort

R v Porter [2008] All ER (D) 249 (May)

In a prosecution under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, the risk that the prosecution has to prove must be real, not fanciful or hypothetical. There is no objective standard or test by which a line can be drawn which will be applicable to every case.

However, most cases will have important factors which the jury will be obliged to take into account in deciding whether or not the risk was real or fanciful. None was determinative, but many were of importance. While the fact that an accident was unavoidable goes primarily to the reasonable practicability of measures which the defendant might have to take, rather than to the risk to safety, it does not do so exclusively.

Risk that is part of everyday incidents of life goes to the issue of whether or not an injured person was exposed to risk by the conduct of the defendant’s operation. Where the risk is truly part of the incident of everyday life, it is less likely that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll