header-logo header-logo

Tort: a new landscape?

06 August 2021 / Vijay Ganapathy
Issue: 7944 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
54498
Vijay Ganapathy considers the future significance of recent cases in tort on foreseeability, quantum & withdrawal of Part 36 offers
  • Begum v Maran (UK) Ltd: foreseeability and liability for overseas activities.
  • Head v Culver Heating Co Ltd: quantum
  • Wormald v Ahmed: settlements and limitations of Part 36 offers:

During lockdown the courts have continued to consider and hand down judgments in cases which are likely significantly to alter the future landscape in many areas of tort.

An example is Begum v Maran (UK) Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 326, where the claimant (B) issued proceedings following the tragic death of her husband, MD Khalil Mollah (K). K suffered a fall while involved in dismantling a decommissioned ship, the Maran Centaurus (MC), at a shipbreaking yard in Chattogram, Bangladesh.

The International Labour Organisation has described shipbreaking as ‘one of the most dangerous jobs in the world’. The court heard that unskilled workers employed in their thousands are exposed to both physical and chemical hazards (many of these ships contain asbestos,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll