header-logo header-logo

Litigation funding regulation: Tough enough?

21 October 2022 / Jason Woodland , Caroline Timoney
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Features , Litigation funding , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
98009
Is the approach to litigation funding in England & Wales ‘soft’, & is regulation on its way? Jason Woodland & Caroline Timoney investigate
  • Regulation of litigation funding is being considered by the EU.
  • The proposals would represent a significant intervention into the market were they to be adopted in England and Wales.
  • The justification for that regulation is significantly less in England and Wales given the existing rules.
  • The need to ensure litigation funders are well-capitalised is something all claimants looking for litigation funding should focus on, but may be an area for regulation.

The prospect of regulation of the litigation funding market is back on the horizon, this time in Europe and with an undisguised agenda. In July, the European Parliament plenary session adopted German MEP Axel Voss’s initial legislative report on responsible private funding of litigation (the Voss report). Mr Voss has previously described litigation funding as ‘happening largely in the shadows’ and that ‘…most agreements are made in secret—rendering them

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll