header-logo header-logo

Litigation funding regulation: Tough enough?

21 October 2022 / Jason Woodland , Caroline Timoney
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Features , Litigation funding , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
98009
Is the approach to litigation funding in England & Wales ‘soft’, & is regulation on its way? Jason Woodland & Caroline Timoney investigate
  • Regulation of litigation funding is being considered by the EU.
  • The proposals would represent a significant intervention into the market were they to be adopted in England and Wales.
  • The justification for that regulation is significantly less in England and Wales given the existing rules.
  • The need to ensure litigation funders are well-capitalised is something all claimants looking for litigation funding should focus on, but may be an area for regulation.

The prospect of regulation of the litigation funding market is back on the horizon, this time in Europe and with an undisguised agenda. In July, the European Parliament plenary session adopted German MEP Axel Voss’s initial legislative report on responsible private funding of litigation (the Voss report). Mr Voss has previously described litigation funding as ‘happening largely in the shadows’ and that ‘…most agreements are made in secret—rendering them

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll