header-logo header-logo

21 October 2022 / Jason Woodland , Caroline Timoney
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Features , Litigation funding , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Litigation funding regulation: Tough enough?

98009
Is the approach to litigation funding in England & Wales ‘soft’, & is regulation on its way? Jason Woodland & Caroline Timoney investigate
  • Regulation of litigation funding is being considered by the EU.
  • The proposals would represent a significant intervention into the market were they to be adopted in England and Wales.
  • The justification for that regulation is significantly less in England and Wales given the existing rules.
  • The need to ensure litigation funders are well-capitalised is something all claimants looking for litigation funding should focus on, but may be an area for regulation.

The prospect of regulation of the litigation funding market is back on the horizon, this time in Europe and with an undisguised agenda. In July, the European Parliament plenary session adopted German MEP Axel Voss’s initial legislative report on responsible private funding of litigation (the Voss report). Mr Voss has previously described litigation funding as ‘happening largely in the shadows’ and that ‘…most agreements are made in secret—rendering them ripe

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll