header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 January 2010
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Town and country planning

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

R (on the application of Perrett) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2009] EWCA Civ 1365; [2009] All ER (D) 175 (Dec)

When a matter was remitted to the secretary of state under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, s 289 there was no obligation on the secretary of state to consider the whole of the enforcement notice appeal de novo. There was power to limit the scope of the matter which was remitted for redetermination.

 

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Consultant firms face tougher scrutiny
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
NLJ this week: AI grievances demand human judgement
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
NLJ this week: Dishonesty, promotions & procedural headaches
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
NLJ this week: Remote hearings reshape the courtroom
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
NLJ this week: Can landlords force the door?
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll