header-logo header-logo

02 October 2015
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Town & country planning

R (on the application of Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd) v Hillingdon London Borough Council [2015] EWHC 2571 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 369 (Jul)

The claimant, Sainsbury’s, applied for judicial review of the defendant local authority’s decision to grant the first interested party permission for the development of a food store. The Administrative Court, in dismissing the application, held that the impact and the sequential tests in the National Planning Policy Framework had been passed, and the reasons for the different conclusion in a prior application for a larger food store had been clear.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll