header-logo header-logo

23 October 2014
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Trade mark dispute: Specsavers v Asda

Specsavers triumphs over Asda in logo trademark battle

Specsavers has triumphed in a five-year trade mark dispute with Asda over its overlapping ellipses logo, which resembles a pair of spectacles.

The dispute arose when Asda prepared marketing based on a similar shape. Specsavers contested this on the basis of trade mark infringement and passing off. The High Court found in favour of Asda and revoked Specsavers wordless trade mark on the basis of non-use since they always have the word “Specsavers” superimposed on them. The case has since been settled out of court, but Specsavers appealed the decision to revoke the wordless logo.

The Court of Appeal has now held that registration of the wordless logo should be reinstated, after referring the issue of non-use to the Court of Justice in Europe (CJEU).

Antony Gold, partner at HGF Law, who acted for Specsavers, says one important issue was whether the public “actually saw or perceived the wordless logo underneath. In this respect, Specsavers was able to point to evidence that, when formulating its marketing campaign, Asda’s marketing team had produced a series of potential logos it could use, each of which, to varying degrees, was modelled on Specsavers’ overlapping ellipses.” This evidence helped to demonstrate that the overlapping ellipses had a separate identity from the usual use of the ellipses with “Specsavers” superimposed.

Ruling in Specsavers v Asda [2014] EWCA Civ 1294, Lord Justice Kitchin said: “It is reasonable to suppose that Asda had a good understanding of the nature of the market, the characteristics of the average consumer and other matters affecting how the average consumer would react to the use of the proposed logos and, for my part, I adhere to the view that this is therefore very persuasive evidence of how the shaded logo mark is perceived.”

Issue: 7627 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll