header-logo header-logo

24 February 2023 / Michael Walker , Nadjia Zychowicz
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Features , Equality , Sports law , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Trans participation in rugby: an unlawful exclusion?

112067
For LGBT+ History Month, Michael Walker & Nadjia Zychowicz explore the legality of the Rugby Football Union’s ban on transgender women competing in female-only forms of their games
  • The Rugby Football Union’s ban against transgender women playing women’s contact rugby breaches the Equality Act 2010.
  • The ban is not a proportionate means of achieving the legitimate aim of protecting the safety and fairness of the sport.

Last summer, by a vote of 33 to 26, the English Rugby Football Union (RFU) voted for changes to its gender participation policy. These changes meant players could only participate in women’s contact rugby ‘if the sex originally recorded at birth is female’, resulting in a blanket ban against transwomen participating in the sport.

When evaluated in the context of the UK’s legislative framework for equality and human rights, this ban breaches the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010).

EqA 2010 protects people from discrimination on the basis of their protected characteristic(s) in certain spheres of society—such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll