header-logo header-logo

Trans participation in rugby: an unlawful exclusion?

24 February 2023 / Michael Walker , Nadjia Zychowicz
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Features , Equality , Sports law , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
112067
For LGBT+ History Month, Michael Walker & Nadjia Zychowicz explore the legality of the Rugby Football Union’s ban on transgender women competing in female-only forms of their games
  • The Rugby Football Union’s ban against transgender women playing women’s contact rugby breaches the Equality Act 2010.
  • The ban is not a proportionate means of achieving the legitimate aim of protecting the safety and fairness of the sport.

Last summer, by a vote of 33 to 26, the English Rugby Football Union (RFU) voted for changes to its gender participation policy. These changes meant players could only participate in women’s contact rugby ‘if the sex originally recorded at birth is female’, resulting in a blanket ban against transwomen participating in the sport.

When evaluated in the context of the UK’s legislative framework for equality and human rights, this ban breaches the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010).

EqA 2010 protects people from discrimination on the basis of their protected characteristic(s) in certain spheres of society—such as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Scott Hilton & Simon Jones

Laytons ETL—Scott Hilton & Simon Jones

City firm launches real estate corporate team to meet growing client demand

Talbots Law—Clare Regan & Lucy George

Talbots Law—Clare Regan & Lucy George

Midlands firm appointshead of real estate development

Charles Russell Speechlys—Libby Elliott

Charles Russell Speechlys—Libby Elliott

Corporate, restructuring and insolvency offering grows with partner hire

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll