header-logo header-logo

11 March 2014 / William Robins
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Transfer complications

William Robins outlines the challenges involved when a case pursued under a CFA is transferred to another firm

There are two undisputed truths at play in the legal sector at present:

  • first, clients want their lawyers to think out of the box and to “risk share”;
  • second, the pressures on partners with client followings from overheads, clients, and competitors have led to more partner-level lawyers moving.

When you put the above two factors together, it is not surprising to learn that it is commonplace for cases pursued under a conditional fee agreement (CFA) to move from one firm to another. Transferring files between firms is not easy at the best of times; one has to consider unpaid fees, work in progress (WIP), the impact on all three parties (the client and both firms) and, of course, compliance with the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA) Code.

These complications are greatly increased where the case to be transferred is subject to a CFA entered into before April

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll