header-logo header-logo

Transfer complications

11 March 2014 / William Robins
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

William Robins outlines the challenges involved when a case pursued under a CFA is transferred to another firm

There are two undisputed truths at play in the legal sector at present:

  • first, clients want their lawyers to think out of the box and to “risk share”;
  • second, the pressures on partners with client followings from overheads, clients, and competitors have led to more partner-level lawyers moving.

When you put the above two factors together, it is not surprising to learn that it is commonplace for cases pursued under a conditional fee agreement (CFA) to move from one firm to another. Transferring files between firms is not easy at the best of times; one has to consider unpaid fees, work in progress (WIP), the impact on all three parties (the client and both firms) and, of course, compliance with the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA) Code.

These complications are greatly increased where the case to be transferred is subject to a CFA entered into before April

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll