header-logo header-logo

20 November 2014 / John McMullen
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Features , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

Transferring weight

mcmullen

John McMullen covers recent cases & developments in the law on TUPE

This year has provided us with a number of interesting TUPE cases, ranging from service provision change, and the timing of a TUPE transfer, to issues of communication by a transferor to the new, transferee, employer.

When service provision change does not apply

Horizon Security Services Limited v (1) Ndeze (2) The PCS Group UKEAT/0071/14/JOJ gives us two illustrations where a service provision change TUPE transfer (Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246), reg 3 (1) (b)) may not apply.

In this case, PCS, a security contractor, had been engaged to provide security services for Workspace Plc, which was looking after a business centre on a site owned by the London Borough of Waltham Forest. Then the site was taken back by the London Borough of Waltham Forest, who engaged a new security company, Horizon, specifically to look after the site for a limited period of eight to nine months pending demolition of the building for the purposes of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll