header-logo header-logo

20 November 2014 / John McMullen
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Features , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

Transferring weight

mcmullen

John McMullen covers recent cases & developments in the law on TUPE

This year has provided us with a number of interesting TUPE cases, ranging from service provision change, and the timing of a TUPE transfer, to issues of communication by a transferor to the new, transferee, employer.

When service provision change does not apply

Horizon Security Services Limited v (1) Ndeze (2) The PCS Group UKEAT/0071/14/JOJ gives us two illustrations where a service provision change TUPE transfer (Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246), reg 3 (1) (b)) may not apply.

In this case, PCS, a security contractor, had been engaged to provide security services for Workspace Plc, which was looking after a business centre on a site owned by the London Borough of Waltham Forest. Then the site was taken back by the London Borough of Waltham Forest, who engaged a new security company, Horizon, specifically to look after the site for a limited period of eight to nine months pending demolition of the building for the purposes of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll