header-logo header-logo

Transferring weight

20 November 2014 / John McMullen
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Features , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail
mcmullen

John McMullen covers recent cases & developments in the law on TUPE

This year has provided us with a number of interesting TUPE cases, ranging from service provision change, and the timing of a TUPE transfer, to issues of communication by a transferor to the new, transferee, employer.

When service provision change does not apply

Horizon Security Services Limited v (1) Ndeze (2) The PCS Group UKEAT/0071/14/JOJ gives us two illustrations where a service provision change TUPE transfer (Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246), reg 3 (1) (b)) may not apply.

In this case, PCS, a security contractor, had been engaged to provide security services for Workspace Plc, which was looking after a business centre on a site owned by the London Borough of Waltham Forest. Then the site was taken back by the London Borough of Waltham Forest, who engaged a new security company, Horizon, specifically to look after the site for a limited period of eight to nine months pending demolition of the building for the purposes of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll