header-logo header-logo

08 June 2018 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7796 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Transforming the courts

nlj_7796_smith

Despite the efforts underway to bring the courts into the 21st century, a wider audit may still be required, says Roger Smith

You can see why ministers would approve the court modernisation programme. It has been set up to have zero financial risk. To put the underlying argument bluntly: overrun on budget? Flog another court. Even so, the National Audit Office (NAO) and now the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) are sniffing around with concerns. The former counselled that ‘delivering change on this scale at pace means that the HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) risks making decisions before it understands the system-wide consequences’. The latter is just beginning an inquiry to which it has summonsed Richard Heaton and Susan Acland-Hood, the respective heads of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and HMCTS.

The concern of the NAO and the PAC is primarily financial. They are worried that the wheeze of court sales will run out of steam and there will be a cost to the treasury after all. As the NAO noted, even in HMCTS

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll