header-logo header-logo

08 June 2018 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7796 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Transforming the courts

nlj_7796_smith

Despite the efforts underway to bring the courts into the 21st century, a wider audit may still be required, says Roger Smith

You can see why ministers would approve the court modernisation programme. It has been set up to have zero financial risk. To put the underlying argument bluntly: overrun on budget? Flog another court. Even so, the National Audit Office (NAO) and now the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) are sniffing around with concerns. The former counselled that ‘delivering change on this scale at pace means that the HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) risks making decisions before it understands the system-wide consequences’. The latter is just beginning an inquiry to which it has summonsed Richard Heaton and Susan Acland-Hood, the respective heads of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and HMCTS.

The concern of the NAO and the PAC is primarily financial. They are worried that the wheeze of court sales will run out of steam and there will be a cost to the treasury after all. As the NAO noted, even in HMCTS

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll