header-logo header-logo

Transforming the courts

08 June 2018 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7796 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
nlj_7796_smith

Despite the efforts underway to bring the courts into the 21st century, a wider audit may still be required, says Roger Smith

You can see why ministers would approve the court modernisation programme. It has been set up to have zero financial risk. To put the underlying argument bluntly: overrun on budget? Flog another court. Even so, the National Audit Office (NAO) and now the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) are sniffing around with concerns. The former counselled that ‘delivering change on this scale at pace means that the HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) risks making decisions before it understands the system-wide consequences’. The latter is just beginning an inquiry to which it has summonsed Richard Heaton and Susan Acland-Hood, the respective heads of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and HMCTS.

The concern of the NAO and the PAC is primarily financial. They are worried that the wheeze of court sales will run out of steam and there will be a cost to the treasury after all. As the NAO noted, even in HMCTS

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll