header-logo header-logo

27 April 2022
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Trapped capital

Low-income individuals with ‘trapped capital’ are unable to access legal aid in 30% of cases, research by the Public Law Project has found

Its report, ‘Trapped capital’ and financial eligibility for legal aid, published this week shows significant hurdles remain for those, including domestic abuse survivors, with trapped capital in a family home or other asset. This is despite the decision in R (oao GR) v Director of Legal Aid Casework [2020] EWHC 3140 (Admin), which established the Director has discretion to value capital assets at nil.

Barriers include financial disincentives for legal aid providers, lack of training of caseworkers, lack of public information and the discretionary nature of the rules.

PLP’s Dr Emma Marshall, co-author of the report, said: ‘These findings are deeply concerning.’ Marshall added the proposals outlined in the government’s consultation, Legal Aid Means Test Review, which closes for responses on 7 June, ‘do not offer much cause for optimism’.
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll