header-logo header-logo

29 April 2011 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7463 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Trials & tribulations

Roger Smith reflects on detainees, masterly performances & Daily Mail fulmination

America’s star 9/11 detainee will, after all, be tried by a military commission. The Obama administration’s original plan to use civilian courts has been defeated. Attorney General Eric Hodder’s final capitulation was forced by Congress restrictions on the use of military funds to bring Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) from Guantanamo to the US.

The trial of KSM, wherever held, poses difficulties. On the one hand, he has confessed to involvement in just about every major terrorist event involving Al Qaeda since the mid-1990s. This included the boast that “I decapitated with my blessed right hand the head of the American Jew, Daniel Pearl” and that he was responsible for 31 specific operations led by the “9/11 operation from A to Z”. The problem is, the US owns up to treatment everyone else would call torture since his arrest in 2003: its agents waterboarded him no less than 183 times.

KSM indicated three years ago that he would plead guilty. He may, indeed,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll