header-logo header-logo

20 January 2011
Issue: 7449 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tribunal claims rise but employment cases fall

Tough economic times have led to a significant increase in tribunals’ workloads.

However, cases in the employment tribunal—reportedly earmarked for government reform—fell by 8% on the same quarter last year.

According to a BBC report last week, the government is considering proposals to charge employees a fee for bringing a claim in order to discourage spurious claims and restricting eligibility for unfair dismissal claims to employees who have worked for two years.

Across the service, a total of 220,400 new claims were received—an increase of 11% over the same quarter of the previous year.
The outstanding caseload at the end of September was 706,200. Multiple actions, where several employees bring a claim against an employer, account for three-fifths of this.

Kevin Sadler, chief executive of the Tribunals Service, says: “There’s no doubt that tough economic conditions have added to our workload, and although employment tribunal cases have fallen compared to the same quarter last year, the social security caseload has continued to grow quickly.

“However, the Tribunals Service has continued to respond to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll