header-logo header-logo

15 January 2016 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A tricky subject

nlj_7682_francis

When will damages be awarded in addition to a permanent injunction in property disputes, asks Andrew Francis

It is generally taken to be the case that when the court grants a permanent injunction to restrain the breach of a property right (or to restore rights where a mandatory injunction is required) and save where there has been physical damage to the claimant’s land, or property, damages for economic loss, for example diminution in value of the claimant’s property, will not usually arise for consideration. After all, the court’s permanent order, whether in prohibitory, or mandatory terms, deals on a “once and for all” basis with the breach, whether the claim is for trespass, breach of covenant, nuisance, or actionable interference with an easement. But as has been said before in another context (Porgy and Bess) it ain’t necessarily so that the grant of the injunction is the end of the matter. As the prayer in Particulars of Claim and Counterclaims invariably states, the claimant seeks an injunction and damages. This applies in claims

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll