header-logo header-logo

15 January 2016 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A tricky subject

nlj_7682_francis

When will damages be awarded in addition to a permanent injunction in property disputes, asks Andrew Francis

It is generally taken to be the case that when the court grants a permanent injunction to restrain the breach of a property right (or to restore rights where a mandatory injunction is required) and save where there has been physical damage to the claimant’s land, or property, damages for economic loss, for example diminution in value of the claimant’s property, will not usually arise for consideration. After all, the court’s permanent order, whether in prohibitory, or mandatory terms, deals on a “once and for all” basis with the breach, whether the claim is for trespass, breach of covenant, nuisance, or actionable interference with an easement. But as has been said before in another context (Porgy and Bess) it ain’t necessarily so that the grant of the injunction is the end of the matter. As the prayer in Particulars of Claim and Counterclaims invariably states, the claimant seeks an injunction and damages. This applies in claims

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll