header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 January 2016 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Tried & prejudice

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7683_bindman

Geoffrey Bindman reflects on historic racism in court

Edward Marshall Hall (1858–1927) was one of the most famous criminal barristers of his time. He was fortunate to be the subject of an admiring biography by his younger friend and colleague Edward Marjoribanks. First published in 1929, it contains accounts of the trials of several of Hall’s most celebrated clients, including George Joseph Smith (the “brides in the bath”) and Seddon the poisoner. Hall’s career coincided with a period in which murder trials—the bloodier the better—were the staple diet of the popular press. They were a major source of public entertainment before the ages of radio and television. Hall was well suited to his starring role: handsome, eloquent, and fearless in his client’s defence.

At the same time, Hall had the common touch. Son of a Brighton GP, he was kind and compassionate, inspiring confidence and affection in all who knew him. It was surprising therefore to find him using racist language and stereotyping in one of his most famous cases. As I was reading

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Two promoted to partner in property litigation and education teams

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Cross-border finance and restructuring specialist joins as of counsel in London

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

IP firm promotes litigator to partnership

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll