header-logo header-logo

03 December 2009 / Tom Webb , John Ogilvie
Issue: 7396 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Trouble brewing

John Ogilvie & Tom Webb explain how & when the courts will enforce non-compete provisions by injunction

Interim injunctions are frequently sought by commercial parties to prevent proposed transactions which are allegedly in breach of existing contractual obligations.

They are often sought in circumstances of urgency and are intended to preserve the status quo, ie to stop a transaction from occurring or being carried into effect, pending a full trial as to the merits of the allegations of breach.

Injunctions are discretionary remedies. There are several considerations which the court will take into account when deciding whether to grant an interim injunction:

Is there a serious question to be tried should it be established at a later date that the injunction should not have been granted?

If so, would the claimant be adequately compensated by an award of damages and would the defendant be in a financial position to pay them? If the answer is yes in both cases, no injunction will normally be granted.

If not, would the defendant be adequately compensated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll