header-logo header-logo

Trouble brewing

03 December 2009 / Tom Webb , John Ogilvie
Issue: 7396 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

John Ogilvie & Tom Webb explain how & when the courts will enforce non-compete provisions by injunction

Interim injunctions are frequently sought by commercial parties to prevent proposed transactions which are allegedly in breach of existing contractual obligations.

They are often sought in circumstances of urgency and are intended to preserve the status quo, ie to stop a transaction from occurring or being carried into effect, pending a full trial as to the merits of the allegations of breach.

Injunctions are discretionary remedies. There are several considerations which the court will take into account when deciding whether to grant an interim injunction:

Is there a serious question to be tried should it be established at a later date that the injunction should not have been granted?

If so, would the claimant be adequately compensated by an award of damages and would the defendant be in a financial position to pay them? If the answer is yes in both cases, no injunction will normally be granted.

If not, would the defendant be adequately compensated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll