header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

TUPE or not TUPE

Employment

Employers could be liable for up to six years of unequal pay claims following an employment appeals tribunal ruling.

In Sodexho v Gutridge it was ruled that in cases of unequal pay when an employee is employed by the transferor organisation, the right to equal pay transfers under TUPE to the organisation taking on the member of staff .

Emma Burrows, a partner at Trowers & Hamlin, says: “Employers will need to consider this ruling whenever they take over the provision of a service previously provided by another organisation. It will obviously be very difficult for employers facing such claims taking on employees under TUPE to determine the pay levels of employees who remained at the transferor’s organisation.” She continues: “Employees are able to claim up to six years worth of back payments to make amends for any pay inequality. This could prove to be very expensive.”

Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll