header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

TUPE or not TUPE

Employment

Employers could be liable for up to six years of unequal pay claims following an employment appeals tribunal ruling.

In Sodexho v Gutridge it was ruled that in cases of unequal pay when an employee is employed by the transferor organisation, the right to equal pay transfers under TUPE to the organisation taking on the member of staff .

Emma Burrows, a partner at Trowers & Hamlin, says: “Employers will need to consider this ruling whenever they take over the provision of a service previously provided by another organisation. It will obviously be very difficult for employers facing such claims taking on employees under TUPE to determine the pay levels of employees who remained at the transferor’s organisation.” She continues: “Employees are able to claim up to six years worth of back payments to make amends for any pay inequality. This could prove to be very expensive.”

Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll